![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
Organ
of the
|
GD Society for Dermopharmacy |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
Dermopharmacy
News The symposium implemented in cooperation with Free University Berlin
and Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (Federal Institute for Risk
Assessment) (BfR) was under the scientific lead of Dr. Karl-Heinz Nietsch,
professor Dr. Monika Schäfer-Korting and professor Dr. Horst Spielmann.
Experts from the most varying fields of activity participated in the symposium
such as dermatology, plastical surgery, oral, maxillo-facial surgery,
pharmacy, cosmetology and jurisprudence who controversially discussed
the benefit/risk relation of the presented treatment methods. A noontime seminar by company Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH was equally part
of the scientific program dealing with properties, effectiveness and questions
on safety of hyalurone-acid containing filler products. Following the
symposium, the company Collagen Aesthetics GmbH presented an additional
course in the scope of which the Hamburg dermatologist Dr. Andreas Britz
demonstrated the application of filler materials in practice to the circle
of interested people. The symposium was opened by addresses of the GD-president Dr. Joachim
Kresken, Viersen, the conference head professor Dr. Monika Schäfer-Korting,
Berlin and the dean of the department biology, chemistry, pharmacy of
the Free University Berlin, professor Dr. Hartmut Hilger. They advocated
the interdisciplinary subject matter of the symposium and emphasized the
fact that this was the first event ever dedicated to injectable filler
materials covering such a broad range of topics and experts participating.. Filler products employed in Germany are exclusively qualified as medicinal
products and thus subject to the responsibility of the Bundesinstitut
für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM) (Federal Institute for
Drugs and Medicinal Products). Significant criterion for the question
whether a filler product can be classified as medicinal product is the
type of its main effect. Only if the latter comes about by a physical
and not by a pharmacological, immunological or metabolical effect the
product is classified as medicinal product and not as drug. This applies
independent from the fact whether the filler material considered is absorbable
or whether it is not. The patient information which is to be documented due to reasons of liability
has to be performed by the physician personally. A reference on the information
of the producer - also if it is provided with a practice stamp - is insufficient
as information measure. In case of inadequate information, the physician
is also liable if the intervention has been performed faultlessly and
workmanlike. The reason for this situation is that the jurisdiction strictly
distinguishes between treatment and information lapses. Beyond this procedure some practices and clinics have established their
own quality control measures in the context of filler products. As reported
by Dr. Natalia Brenner of Elisées Academy, Bonn, this comprises
the employment of imaging by means of which the result of wrinkle treatment
by injection can be objectively controlled. Thus for example the thickness
increase and collagen content of skin can be made visible by means of
skin ultra sonics. Dr. Claudia Borelli of Dermatologische Klinik der Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität
(Dermatological Clinic of Ludwig-Maximilians University), Munich, informed
about the use of Poly-L-lactic acid at facial lipodystrophy which is often
the case at HIV patients after an anti-viral therapy. Own experience of
the referee as well as results of the VEGA-study performed in France show
that the Poly-L-lactic acid is very effective in this treatment. Nevertheless,
the treatment result - even if sonographically an increase of the skin
thickness has been determined - is optically not always convincing. Advantages of the collagen treatment are besides the high safety standard
the easy injection technique, large scale of indications and long-term
application experience. Adversely are the relative little stability, the
necessary allergy test and the longer time/effect interval. Also a granuloma
formation cannot - as for other filler substances - be completely excluded. Native hyaluronic acid is water soluble and synthesized at the cell membrane
of fibroblasts. In the basal layer of the skin it is located intracellularly,
in upper layers extracellularly and reversibly crosslinked. The hyaluronic
acid used in filler products is at the time being mostly biotechnologically
extracted from bacteria cultures. Due to its ubiquitary source the substance
is not antigen so that the allergy test effected before a collagen treatment
is omitted. Intolerability appearing in only few cases after application
of hyaluronic acid fillers is caused by additives. For the latter the so-called CPM (cohesive poly-densified matrix) and
the DXL (double cross linked hyaluronic acid) methods are used. By the
CPM process monophasic gels with a period of effect of up to six months
can be produced which are recommended for the application at fine wrinkles.
The DXL process entails biphasic gels with smaller particles suitable
for the treatment of deeper wrinkles owing to their higher thermo and
in-vivo stability as well as their excellent spreadability. As the Munich dermatologist Dr. Sabine Zenker explained, also here the
particle size determines the indication profile: while the product with
the smaller particles (60-70 µm) is used for the correction of deeper
wrinkles and skin irregulatories and injected deeply into the dermis,
the one with the larger particles (80-90 µm) serves the "remodeling"
of facial contours and is accordingly deeply injected in the subcutaneous
adipose tissue. Both products are not indicated for superficial wrinkles. According to information by Dr. Dr. Christoph Lenzen, St. Josef-Hospital
Krefeld-Uerdingen, who is concerned with histological documentation and
treatment of complications after wrinkle treatment by facial injection,
granuloma frequently emerges after application of non-absorbable filler
materials. Compliant with a recommendation by the Deutsche Gesellschaft
für Ästhetische Chirurgie (German Society for Aesthetical Surgery)
it is recommended not to use these materials any longer. The facial areas which are mostly affected by disorders are in compliance
with Lenzen's survey the lip and nasolabial area. Lenzen complained that
in spite of the information duty patients treated by him due to complications
were oftentimes not informed about the material injected. Contra-indications and interactions have to be considered as well as
the fact that too large a quantity of absorbable materials is not completely
disintegrated. On the side of the patient the immunological status is
of major importance. Changes in the hormone status or in the T-cell imparted
defence increase the risk for granuloma. As Lenzen also other referees and participants in discussion pointed
out that the granuloma risk may not be neglected. It is to be considered
that granulomas being very delicate can never be completely removed by
surgery. Also the few existing medicamentous treatment options - intra-lesional
injections of hyaluronidasis, 5-fluorouracil or triamcinolone as well
as oral Allopurinol - are to be critically questioned in this indication.
According to the evaluation of several symposium participants the disproportionately low number of notifications implies a high number of unreported cases. Obviously many physicians are not aware of the fact that complications after application of filler products fulfill in many cases the elements of an offence of a severe aggravation of the health state in the sense of MPG and are therefore subject to notification. An additional reason for the high estimated number of unknown cases is seen in the fact that injectable filler products are also applied by non-physicians. This problem may possibly be solved - according to the proposal of a symposium participant - by classifying filler products as prescription drugs. After all there are other medicinal products with rather low risk potential which are also available on prescription only (for example dimethyl sulfoxide-containing ear drops). Significance ofbotulinum toxin A Besides filler products also the role of botulinum toxin A has been addressed in the scope of the symposium. In Germany it is available as prescription drug. As Lucie Rauch from the Dermatological Clinic at Heinrich-Heine-University in Düsseldorf explained, the anti-wrinkle effect of this substance consists of a selective and irreversible blocking of the release of acetyl choline from the neuro-muscular end plate which leads to a limp paralyzation of the skeleton muscular system at the place of the injection. The effect abates about three to six months after the injection as a re-sprouting of axon terminals at the nerve endings comes then about. In order to prevent major paralyzes the anatomy of the facial muscular system has to be considered. Recommended is merely the application in the upper part of the face. Injections in the lower part of the face have in many times caused problems while speaking and eating. An excessive treatment entails mimic rigor. Alternatives to filler productsDr. Andreas Britz, Hamburg, sees an alternative to the application of filler products in the chemical peeling, which is to be especially recommended at minor wrinkles and light-induced skin ageing. The optimal success can be achieved in the face, eye, and throat region as here the follicle density and skin regeneration level are very high. As concerns the ingredients of peeling products, besides other organic acids surprisingly phenol and resorcin are still used although these substances are considered to be critical and therefore their use in medicaments is no longer allowed. An additional alternative to wrinkle augmentation is the method of autologous fat transplantation which was presented by Dr. Birgit Wörle, Darmstadt. Here the patient is subcutaneously injected his own fat tissue, which has been extracted in a tumenescence process or by liposuction and cleaned from connective tissue. Major application areas are wrinkles in the entire facial area and deep circumorbital rings. A repeated application is required. Side effects are among others pain, erythema and oedema while the risk of a fat embolism is only very little when using blunt canulas.
Professor Dr. Ulrike Heinrich of Institut für experimentelle Dermatologie (Institute for Experimental Dermatologie) at University Witten/Herdecke tried to answer the question whether respectively to which extent the effects of injectable filler materials can equally be obtained by employing cosmetic agents. She demonstrated by means of studies based on objective methods in which roughness, scaling, smoothness and wrinkle depth of the skin was measured, that certain care creams are indeed able to smoothen dryness wrinkles on a limited scale, they are however no real alternatives to filler products. Summary and outlookIn summarizing words, the acting president of the GD, professor Dr. Hans Christian Korting of Dermatologische Klinik (Dermatological Clinic) at Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, stressed the interdisciplinarity and high degree of topicality of the subject matter dealt with. A trend in direction of skin augmentation can be observed the possibilities and benefit/risk balance of which has been clearly presented in the course of the symposium. Lectures and discussion contributions of the symposium have been subject
to continued reflection on certain questions. Korting expresses his special
thanks to all moderators and lecturers, the Free University Berlin as
host as well as the organizers and sponsors.
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
February 2008 | ![]() |
Copyright © 2000 - 2014 Institute for Dermopharmacy GmbH. Contact: webmaster@gd-online.de |